Literally my entire thought process whenever the government start to talk a big game about how 'the American people need to know the truth'. Lol, sure Jan.
I met Bart Sibrel, who found the moon walk rehearsal tapes in the basement of the TV studio where he worked and made the movie, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. Totally normal guy, movie makes complete sense. Faking the moon landing was child's play compared to the pandemic!
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
I really go back and forth on if the moon landing was fake.
But one question that always comes to mind regarding the moon landing is- If we landed on the moon in 1969, why haven't we been able/wanted to go back?
I watched an interview from PBD with Bart Sibrel recently- and he brings up a lot of good points and footage.
This boggles my mind, as i watch these private companies spend billions and struggle to even launch there rockets beyond most of Earth's atmospheric layers, much less fathom them even going to the moon. Its quite strange that we haven't gone back with the advances in science and Audio & video recording tech, so as to further document and take samples for scientific study. Very weird to me when I really stop and think about it. LOL
He looked annoyed to me. Being followed like that with a 🎤I wouldn’t have done that with the Bible whether I had done it or not, just trying to get away from him & his camera crew.
" If we landed on the moon in 1969, why haven't we been able/wanted to go back?"
Your question begs another...... How do you (we) know there are not people on the moon right now?
Consider Apollo in context....
1. Everyone in the 1950's was expecting a Jetsons world with hover cars and moon bases by the year 2000.
2. Mainstream newspapers published very matter-of-fact articles about how all the big name aerospace companies were openly researching anti-gravity technology. And they were. It was no secret. The research was all out in the open. It was (by all accounts) just around the corner.
3. The same people who predicted hover cars and a Jetsons lifestyle also predicted 'computers' the size of small briefcases that you could use to make Skype calls with while on the go.
Why were their predictions so spot on when it came to computers / telecoms tech...... but completely wrong when it came to transport/ propulsion tech?
HERE'S A CLUE: If anti gravity tech had gone public at the start of the 1960's it would have ended big oil's monopoly and liberated the masses from the scarcity paradigm. We would all have hover cars by now and we'd be holidaying to Mars. Transport (and shipping of goods) would be dirt cheap and we'd all be happy and free and enjoying high standards of living (AKA a Jetsons world).
Obviously that can't be allowed to happen.... so at the end of the 1950's all talk of anti gravity abruptly stopped, and it remains a taboo subject to this day. At the same time the expectant (and space crazy) public were supplied with (trumpets) the Apollo program!!!! .... which used 1940's rocket technology to allegedly put a bunch of Freemasons on the moon, who all 'came back' from their 'amazing adventure' and became troubled recluses or violent alcoholics.
In the 50 years since the Apollo program, rocket technology still hasn't advanced beyond the 1940's. The space shuttle and now Elon's space X are just repackaged versions of the same basic technology (with a few superficial add ons).
Meanwhile the ACTUAL space program, in the hands of the big aerospace companies, is probably zooming all over the solar system in their fancy pants anti grav vehicles - vehicles that are already 50 years old! ..... while Gen Alpha are being encouraged by NASA, their teachers and the WEF to cheer for rockets (1940's tech), windmills (abandoned 200 years ago) and electric cars (abandoned 100 years ago).
But it gets even more silly..... the proposed '15 minute cities', banning of cars and an end to air travel (for all but the elite) will return us (but obviously not 'them') to medieval style lifestyles. In medieval times people rarely left the city/ county they were born in, they had no personal mobility, they were living in scarcity, they lived 'small', unambitious lives. This is how we will live in the proposed 15 minute cities, under climate lockdowns and carbon taxes. As the WEF say in their promotional videos "By 2030 you will own nothing and be happy".
The fakery of Apollo is just one portion of a much larger scam ... that scam is a literal 'breakaway civilisation' of technocrats and mega corporations, who have hoarded the best (and most empowering) technologies of the last 50+ years for themselves, and are trying to fob the rest of us off with garbage technologies, so they can live as kings.... or even as gods... compared to the rest of us who will be digital serfs (global citizens). Under the new proposals, we won't even have money. CBDC's are just digital tokens, and we won't even get to decide what they can be used for.
To summarise.... Technologies that make enslavement easier have been allowed to thrive, while technologies that would liberate humanity from scarcity have been suppressed. That's why Apollo is about more than just a bunch of astronauts on wires pretending to be walking on the moon.
Yes it does make a lot of sense doesn't it! When you factor in 'human nature' to the equation it's obvious this is exactly the sort of thing that would happen too. The people who are the most greedy and power hungry (and the least altruistic) are also the people who are most likely to end up in charge of all these high tech industries and their research programs.
It also explains why so many expensive projects (new fighter jets etc) often go 10x over budget. A lot of people think most of the funding (our taxes) ends up funding these secret toys instead. Occasional there's an official admission of trillions just 'missing' from military budgets. It just got lost somehow. Slipped down the back of the sofa!
If only the feminists would draw attention to the unequal distribution of advanced technology that could liberate the planet and end poverty (and pollution) ....... instead of the inequalities of manspreading and the salaries of female footballers.
You do know that there were SIX landings on the moon and not just one, right?
Apollo 11, Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, and Apollo 17 were all the missions that landed on the moon. An additional 3 were planned but cancelled.
The videos from the lunar landings aren’t from Apollo 11; they’re from later missions.
Do you think Apollo 13 issues that risked the lives of the 3 astronauts aboard were just one big hoax, too? That NASA engineers didn’t work night and day to bring them back safely?
I remember seeing an interview with one of the astronauts admitting that the filmed landing was a recreation because they did not have video cameras in space. Which makes the trip plausible, but when you add in the ship and equipment was supposedly destroyed by NASA it doesn’t add up. Everything else is put into museums for citizens to view, but the most important equipment was not. That strikes me as odd.
I started off mocking the moon landing deniers. And then I actually started looking at their claims and critiques of the evidence, and let's just say the story is clearly stranger than we initially thought...
Also same. I've always thought the deniers were bonkers, now I'm truly excited to learn more. I kind of can't even believe I'm saying this but I'm also wondering why i didn't question it more, sooner. The dust and hammer sound have me super intrigued. Looking forward to the rabbit hole. Outstanding post as usual, hope you're feeling better Jessica.
A trend I've been noticing more and more these days. Once we look into something with our own eyes we realize it makes a lot more sense than what they we've been told us....
It has always been the Van Allen Belt question for me. Surviving radiation at those levels, just for film they had back then would’ve been impossible. Plus the dust. You can’t fake dust no matter how hard you try. It’s something men filled with hubris believe no one would notice.
To send pictures back to Earth, they probably used small TV cameras. In the fifties, they didn't have solid state video cameras like we do today, but they had vacuum tube based TV cameras such as they used to make TV shows. They probably made some more compact ones just for the mission. Don't know, just guessing.
The question that gives me pause and reason to question a moon landing: why has no one, from any other country, gone to the moon? With the intense competition between Russia and the USA, and China, and other countries with substantial financial resources and advanced technological capabilities, in 60 years they have never put someone on the moon just to show the USA and their own citizens that they CAN?! That seems completely unbelievable to me. The cost of the moon landings compared to todays economy- you would think billionaires and governments would do it just to do it.
Because no one else had a Saturn V rocket back then. Only now is rocket design matching the power and speed of the Saturn V.
Also, no other country had nearly the financial resources to spend on such a project in the mid-20th century. It took over a decade of planning, development, and testing to reach the moon. Work on the project started under the Eisenhower administration..
Jul 31, 2023·edited Jul 31, 2023Liked by Jessica Reed Kraus
I think man has been to the moon but that was definitely a faked moon landing by Kubrick , I remember watching it at the time and the more one thinks about it how would it ever be possible to have filmed it from the moon .Thank you Jessica and yes more importantly the names of Epsteins ‘clients ‘ need to be revealed .
Definitely don’t think we ever landed on the moon. It’s one of those things that always reminded me of the “my dad can beat up your dad” threats. 99% of the time a kid would not have to make good on this. And he’d never have to prove anything. The funny thing is, I think the other guys got closer because they weren’t cheating, which is why they never made it. As an adult, it felt more to me that these countries were just comparing rocket ship sizes. And it just didn’t matter in the end. It’s joked, “gosh. We landed on the moon, but we can’t do such-and-such?!” This comparison is anecdotal now at best. And to me, proves we didn’t get there and no human ever will. Sorry, Elon.
I've seen a book where there is a tentative picture montage of a Russian astronaut in a 0 gravity test airplane with the airplane background and space background. I think they also tried it but didn't have enough technology to pull a narrative.
I can't find it, it's from the time I started reading on moon landings with "Wagging The Moondoggie", Ralph Rene and others. Unfortunately neither can I find the book nor find the websites that resourced them, I feel the internet is becoming a smaller place of ideas.
As a massive Kubrick fan this made my week! When you pointed out the reason for the Grady Twins presence in the film representing the Gemini missions, my mind was blown. It all connects and it makes sense. Brilliant investigative work!!
True. But the alien stuff goes back hundreds of years. And I do believe in the abduction tales. A faked moon landing makes sense in a race against Russia. A
Here's the link to the interview you mentioned, in case anyone wants to see it. It's funny that most people in my country don't even question if the moonlanding ever happened. I've always felt curious about the subject but never researched it, now I will. Love your posts!
I just started dating a man and one of my first questions was to make sure he didn’t fully believe we went to the moon. Also jfk was killed by the cia and 9/11 was an inside job.
I’m very split on the moon landing. It seems crazy to me that we have been unable to return there some 50+ years later with better technology. Also, since we know the precise date of the moon landing, has anyone been able to correlate where Kubrick was on that day? For instance, on set filming elsewhere?
There is so much to unravel on both sides. What tends to sway me into the "it happened" category is the fact that several people close to Apollo astronauts Armstrong/Aldrin were told by them that they were being watched by very large extraterrestrial vehicles which were on the Moon when they landed. AstronautEdgarMitchell verified this in several interviews.
So, we can participate in the InternationalSpaceStation, but have problems believing the MoonLanding? There is so much which is not being disclosed to us mere Earthlings.
Edit: Found 2013 video of TimothyGood's UFO lecture. It's over an hour long, but he chats about a member of MI6, PamelaHanford, at a classified NASA meeting where she overheard Armstrong/Aldrin discussions about the alien craft which had been there when they landed. The astronauts have also been flying alien aircraft for quite a long time.
Go to the 40:00 mark, but the entire video is worth the time:
The meme at the end is it!
RIGHT?
Literally my entire thought process whenever the government start to talk a big game about how 'the American people need to know the truth'. Lol, sure Jan.
I met Bart Sibrel, who found the moon walk rehearsal tapes in the basement of the TV studio where he worked and made the movie, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. Totally normal guy, movie makes complete sense. Faking the moon landing was child's play compared to the pandemic!
you have a point!
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-x-preparing-for-power-sars
spot on
I really go back and forth on if the moon landing was fake.
But one question that always comes to mind regarding the moon landing is- If we landed on the moon in 1969, why haven't we been able/wanted to go back?
I watched an interview from PBD with Bart Sibrel recently- and he brings up a lot of good points and footage.
This boggles my mind, as i watch these private companies spend billions and struggle to even launch there rockets beyond most of Earth's atmospheric layers, much less fathom them even going to the moon. Its quite strange that we haven't gone back with the advances in science and Audio & video recording tech, so as to further document and take samples for scientific study. Very weird to me when I really stop and think about it. LOL
ok, I'll have to watch that one.
do it! I believe Bart Sibrel (could be mistaken) was the one that got punched by buzz aldrin.
Unless buzz has a history of punching deniers lol
He looked annoyed to me. Being followed like that with a 🎤I wouldn’t have done that with the Bible whether I had done it or not, just trying to get away from him & his camera crew.
" If we landed on the moon in 1969, why haven't we been able/wanted to go back?"
Your question begs another...... How do you (we) know there are not people on the moon right now?
Consider Apollo in context....
1. Everyone in the 1950's was expecting a Jetsons world with hover cars and moon bases by the year 2000.
2. Mainstream newspapers published very matter-of-fact articles about how all the big name aerospace companies were openly researching anti-gravity technology. And they were. It was no secret. The research was all out in the open. It was (by all accounts) just around the corner.
3. The same people who predicted hover cars and a Jetsons lifestyle also predicted 'computers' the size of small briefcases that you could use to make Skype calls with while on the go.
Why were their predictions so spot on when it came to computers / telecoms tech...... but completely wrong when it came to transport/ propulsion tech?
HERE'S A CLUE: If anti gravity tech had gone public at the start of the 1960's it would have ended big oil's monopoly and liberated the masses from the scarcity paradigm. We would all have hover cars by now and we'd be holidaying to Mars. Transport (and shipping of goods) would be dirt cheap and we'd all be happy and free and enjoying high standards of living (AKA a Jetsons world).
Obviously that can't be allowed to happen.... so at the end of the 1950's all talk of anti gravity abruptly stopped, and it remains a taboo subject to this day. At the same time the expectant (and space crazy) public were supplied with (trumpets) the Apollo program!!!! .... which used 1940's rocket technology to allegedly put a bunch of Freemasons on the moon, who all 'came back' from their 'amazing adventure' and became troubled recluses or violent alcoholics.
In the 50 years since the Apollo program, rocket technology still hasn't advanced beyond the 1940's. The space shuttle and now Elon's space X are just repackaged versions of the same basic technology (with a few superficial add ons).
Meanwhile the ACTUAL space program, in the hands of the big aerospace companies, is probably zooming all over the solar system in their fancy pants anti grav vehicles - vehicles that are already 50 years old! ..... while Gen Alpha are being encouraged by NASA, their teachers and the WEF to cheer for rockets (1940's tech), windmills (abandoned 200 years ago) and electric cars (abandoned 100 years ago).
But it gets even more silly..... the proposed '15 minute cities', banning of cars and an end to air travel (for all but the elite) will return us (but obviously not 'them') to medieval style lifestyles. In medieval times people rarely left the city/ county they were born in, they had no personal mobility, they were living in scarcity, they lived 'small', unambitious lives. This is how we will live in the proposed 15 minute cities, under climate lockdowns and carbon taxes. As the WEF say in their promotional videos "By 2030 you will own nothing and be happy".
The fakery of Apollo is just one portion of a much larger scam ... that scam is a literal 'breakaway civilisation' of technocrats and mega corporations, who have hoarded the best (and most empowering) technologies of the last 50+ years for themselves, and are trying to fob the rest of us off with garbage technologies, so they can live as kings.... or even as gods... compared to the rest of us who will be digital serfs (global citizens). Under the new proposals, we won't even have money. CBDC's are just digital tokens, and we won't even get to decide what they can be used for.
To summarise.... Technologies that make enslavement easier have been allowed to thrive, while technologies that would liberate humanity from scarcity have been suppressed. That's why Apollo is about more than just a bunch of astronauts on wires pretending to be walking on the moon.
WOW- when you lay it all out like that it makes total sense!!
I would have never connected those dots like you have.
Thank you!
Yes it does make a lot of sense doesn't it! When you factor in 'human nature' to the equation it's obvious this is exactly the sort of thing that would happen too. The people who are the most greedy and power hungry (and the least altruistic) are also the people who are most likely to end up in charge of all these high tech industries and their research programs.
It also explains why so many expensive projects (new fighter jets etc) often go 10x over budget. A lot of people think most of the funding (our taxes) ends up funding these secret toys instead. Occasional there's an official admission of trillions just 'missing' from military budgets. It just got lost somehow. Slipped down the back of the sofa!
If only the feminists would draw attention to the unequal distribution of advanced technology that could liberate the planet and end poverty (and pollution) ....... instead of the inequalities of manspreading and the salaries of female footballers.
Very well laid out! Thank you.
I can’t find the video online. When I search it’s only buzz aldrin videos? Do you have a link?
https://youtu.be/4kiBvdYO4yw
Here is the youtube link of the interview :)
You do know that there were SIX landings on the moon and not just one, right?
Apollo 11, Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, and Apollo 17 were all the missions that landed on the moon. An additional 3 were planned but cancelled.
The videos from the lunar landings aren’t from Apollo 11; they’re from later missions.
Do you think Apollo 13 issues that risked the lives of the 3 astronauts aboard were just one big hoax, too? That NASA engineers didn’t work night and day to bring them back safely?
That makes sense.
I remember seeing an interview with one of the astronauts admitting that the filmed landing was a recreation because they did not have video cameras in space. Which makes the trip plausible, but when you add in the ship and equipment was supposedly destroyed by NASA it doesn’t add up. Everything else is put into museums for citizens to view, but the most important equipment was not. That strikes me as odd.
Defiantly.
This is what I’ve always thought was the most likely. Someone did go to the moon BUT the filmed part was not that same trip.
I started off mocking the moon landing deniers. And then I actually started looking at their claims and critiques of the evidence, and let's just say the story is clearly stranger than we initially thought...
Same.
Also same. I've always thought the deniers were bonkers, now I'm truly excited to learn more. I kind of can't even believe I'm saying this but I'm also wondering why i didn't question it more, sooner. The dust and hammer sound have me super intrigued. Looking forward to the rabbit hole. Outstanding post as usual, hope you're feeling better Jessica.
A trend I've been noticing more and more these days. Once we look into something with our own eyes we realize it makes a lot more sense than what they we've been told us....
It has always been the Van Allen Belt question for me. Surviving radiation at those levels, just for film they had back then would’ve been impossible. Plus the dust. You can’t fake dust no matter how hard you try. It’s something men filled with hubris believe no one would notice.
All these details are so much fun to mull over. This is why it’s one of my favorite conspiracies.
This would be a fun one to meet as a zoom group to explore! Munchies and the Moon landing!
Yes!!
To send pictures back to Earth, they probably used small TV cameras. In the fifties, they didn't have solid state video cameras like we do today, but they had vacuum tube based TV cameras such as they used to make TV shows. They probably made some more compact ones just for the mission. Don't know, just guessing.
The question that gives me pause and reason to question a moon landing: why has no one, from any other country, gone to the moon? With the intense competition between Russia and the USA, and China, and other countries with substantial financial resources and advanced technological capabilities, in 60 years they have never put someone on the moon just to show the USA and their own citizens that they CAN?! That seems completely unbelievable to me. The cost of the moon landings compared to todays economy- you would think billionaires and governments would do it just to do it.
Great point.
Rumor on the street is ... we haven’t gone back... because of what/who is on the moon.... 😉
🌟 Cue the twilight zone music 🌟
Because no one else had a Saturn V rocket back then. Only now is rocket design matching the power and speed of the Saturn V.
Also, no other country had nearly the financial resources to spend on such a project in the mid-20th century. It took over a decade of planning, development, and testing to reach the moon. Work on the project started under the Eisenhower administration..
I think man has been to the moon but that was definitely a faked moon landing by Kubrick , I remember watching it at the time and the more one thinks about it how would it ever be possible to have filmed it from the moon .Thank you Jessica and yes more importantly the names of Epsteins ‘clients ‘ need to be revealed .
Definitely don’t think we ever landed on the moon. It’s one of those things that always reminded me of the “my dad can beat up your dad” threats. 99% of the time a kid would not have to make good on this. And he’d never have to prove anything. The funny thing is, I think the other guys got closer because they weren’t cheating, which is why they never made it. As an adult, it felt more to me that these countries were just comparing rocket ship sizes. And it just didn’t matter in the end. It’s joked, “gosh. We landed on the moon, but we can’t do such-and-such?!” This comparison is anecdotal now at best. And to me, proves we didn’t get there and no human ever will. Sorry, Elon.
I've seen a book where there is a tentative picture montage of a Russian astronaut in a 0 gravity test airplane with the airplane background and space background. I think they also tried it but didn't have enough technology to pull a narrative.
Do you remember what the book was called?
I can't find it, it's from the time I started reading on moon landings with "Wagging The Moondoggie", Ralph Rene and others. Unfortunately neither can I find the book nor find the websites that resourced them, I feel the internet is becoming a smaller place of ideas.
Interesting. Also I love that your handle is Mars. lol
As a massive Kubrick fan this made my week! When you pointed out the reason for the Grady Twins presence in the film representing the Gemini missions, my mind was blown. It all connects and it makes sense. Brilliant investigative work!!
I’m Glad you enjoyed it! I LOVE dissecting Kubrick 👏🏼
Easy to think that if they could fake a moon landing, they could be faking this alien stuff.
True. But the alien stuff goes back hundreds of years. And I do believe in the abduction tales. A faked moon landing makes sense in a race against Russia. A
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7f1g9t
Here's the link to the interview you mentioned, in case anyone wants to see it. It's funny that most people in my country don't even question if the moonlanding ever happened. I've always felt curious about the subject but never researched it, now I will. Love your posts!
I just started dating a man and one of my first questions was to make sure he didn’t fully believe we went to the moon. Also jfk was killed by the cia and 9/11 was an inside job.
He made the cut
Wow, tough crowd, lol! I don’t think I would make the cut if that’s the standard someone had but after 2020 I’m definitely up to hear more!
I’m very split on the moon landing. It seems crazy to me that we have been unable to return there some 50+ years later with better technology. Also, since we know the precise date of the moon landing, has anyone been able to correlate where Kubrick was on that day? For instance, on set filming elsewhere?
It’s not the lack of technology. It’s the lack of will and the cost. The last 3 planned lunar missions were cancelled.
please please please edit the headline asap - "The Shinning"<sic>
takes away from all credibility of your great writing and blogs!
Oh gosh, ok thank you. I posted this in bed with the stomach flu 😩
There is so much to unravel on both sides. What tends to sway me into the "it happened" category is the fact that several people close to Apollo astronauts Armstrong/Aldrin were told by them that they were being watched by very large extraterrestrial vehicles which were on the Moon when they landed. AstronautEdgarMitchell verified this in several interviews.
So, we can participate in the InternationalSpaceStation, but have problems believing the MoonLanding? There is so much which is not being disclosed to us mere Earthlings.
Edit: Found 2013 video of TimothyGood's UFO lecture. It's over an hour long, but he chats about a member of MI6, PamelaHanford, at a classified NASA meeting where she overheard Armstrong/Aldrin discussions about the alien craft which had been there when they landed. The astronauts have also been flying alien aircraft for quite a long time.
Go to the 40:00 mark, but the entire video is worth the time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdT4po0yLDA